The intersection of law, sexuality, and human rights has been a battleground in various corners of the world, with legislative measures aimed at regulating or restricting homosexuality evoking intense discussions and disagreements. The enactment of anti-homosexuality acts reflects a complex interplay of cultural values, religious beliefs, and political ideologies.
And the same is visible in the country of Uganda, which recently passed an “Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2023”. The broader impact of this legislation is designed to regulate or criminalize same-sex relationships. It is crucial to recognize the far-reaching implications of such laws on individual freedoms, human rights, and the ongoing global conversation around LGBTQ+ rights.
Through this article, we will be discussing the Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2023 and whether it is an ethical step as portrayed by the government or a suppressive step which hampers human rights, its legal implications, its history, how it is going to affect the people of Uganda, the International Relations of Uganda with different nations and the necessary steps that need to be taken for maintain equity and fairness through justice.
So let’s begin with the Uganda Anti-Homsexuality Act, 2023.
What Is The Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023?
Recently, a comprehensive anti-gay law was passed in Uganda making it illegal for a person to identify himself as LGBTQ. This can lead to severe punishments for same-sex relationships. Although same-sex relationships are already illegal in over 30 African countries, including Uganda, this new law seems to be the first to specifically forbid LGBTQ+ community’s self-identification.
History Of The Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2023
Before this act, the Uganda government has passed an act prohibiting sexual relations between persons of the same sex. The original version of the act included provisions for the death penalty, which led to it being dubbed the “Kill the Gays bill” in the mainstream media of the United West.
However, the penalty was later changed to life imprisonment. However, the Ugandan Constitutional Court declared the act unconstitutional on procedural grounds.
Since then in 2023, the government was again successful in bringing a fresh and more restrictive bill to the country and passing it to become an act. This has led to outrage among the LGBTQ+ communities in the country and around the globe.
Constitutionality and Its Legal Implication
The Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2023 defies several basic rights protected by Uganda’s constitution and various international treaties. Although same-sex behaviour is already punishable by life in prison, a crime that is rarely prosecuted in Uganda, the new law adds new offences, such as the ambiguously worded “promotion of homosexuality”, and it also establishes the death penalty for several actions which deemed to constitute “aggravated homosexuality”. (engaging in homosexual relations with minors).
Additionally, it raises the maximum prison term to ten years for attempted same-sex conduct.
Contrary to Uganda’s Constitution, the law discriminates against individuals with disabilities by aggravating the offence of homosexuality if the “victim” has a disability. This deprives individuals with disabilities of the ability to give their consent for sexual activity. A person who supports the rights of LGBTQ+ may be sentenced to up to 20 years in prison for the “promotion of homosexuality”.
This includes human rights organisation representatives and those who donate money to groups that support LGBTQ+ rights. The anti-homosexuality bill is a grave blow to a number of fundamental rights, such as the freedom of association and expression, privacy, equality, and nondiscrimination.
Effects On The People of Uganda
In Uganda, there is already a lot of violence and prejudice towards LGBTQ+ individuals. After the passing of the new act, Ugandan individuals have experienced a marked rise in arbitrary arrests, police abuse, extortion, job loss, discriminatory evictions by landlords, and restricted access to health services due to their perceived gender identity or sexual orientation.
Over the years and even in the present times, Ugandan police have arbitrarily detained large numbers of people during LGBT pride events, at gay-friendly bars, and homeless shelters. They have also subjected some of the detainees to anal examinations, which are cruel, inhumane, and sometimes even torture.
Additionally, a number of break-ins into the offices of nongovernmental organizations—including those that offer services to the LGBTI community—have gone uninvestigated by the authorities. The well-known LGBTQ+ rights group, Sexual Minorities Uganda (‘SMUG’) was prohibited from operating by the government after the passing of the Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2023.
A great number of people are also fleeing their cities, towns, occupations, and families out of fear of being taken into custody by the police or being pursued by their neighbours.
Currently, in Uganda, being LGBTQ+ means losing everything, including family, and a large number of people are attempting to escape to neighbouring countries in search of safety and asylum. Nevertheless, it is not simple to flee to nearby nations; aside from the difficulty of travelling and the high expense of doing so, resettlements have long been prohibited, and foreign nations do not accept LGBTQ+ individuals as refugees.
Also Read: Why American Police Officers look like a Soldiers?
Effects on International Relations With Different Nations
The passage of Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2023 has led to diplomatic tensions with different countries and international organizations that advocate for LGBTQ+ rights. Countries that promote human rights and inclusivity are expressing concerns and condemning the legislation, which might lead to strained diplomatic relations.
President Joe Biden of the United States has referred to the action as “a tragic violation” of human rights and stated that Washington would assess the law’s effects “on all aspects of U.S. engagement with Uganda”.
The World Bank Group has also showed its concern and stated that people would be put in danger by the act because it would make it harder to get essential medical care, screening for diseases, and precautions. Furthermore, the institution’s values of inclusion and nondiscrimination are incompatible with the act.
With an emphasis on all groups, particularly those who are marginalised, disadvantaged, or vulnerable, the World Bank Group prioritises inclusive development in order to achieve its goals. which will be obstructed after the passing of this act.
Some countries like USA and international organizations have started to reconsider or modify their foreign aid or assistance programs in response to the passage of anti-LGBTQ+ laws. The business community, investors, and trading partners are reacting to the anti-LGBTQ+ legislation by reassessing economic ties. Companies and investors are also getting reluctant to operate in a country like Uganda with discriminatory laws.
Necessary Steps That Need to Be Taken to Repeal The Act
The act needs to be challenged before the Court of Uganda, which has been already done by the people, but relying upon the court fully and blindly will be counterintuitive. Hence, the people also need to take other measures in the fight against the anti-homosexuality act. For instance, Ugandans need to engage with international human rights bodies and organizations that can support legal challenges on the grounds of violations of international human rights standards.
They need to promote awareness about the negative consequences of anti-LGBTQ+ laws through public campaigns, media engagement, and community outreach. Simultaneously, they should provide support and resources to local LGBTQ+ organizations and activists who are working on the ground to promote equality and human rights. They should also form alliances with other human rights organizations, civil society groups, and allies to strengthen advocacy efforts.
Violence cannot be a means to a solution as it might lead to bloodshed and internal conflict between the government and Ugandan people and will shake the democratic value to its core. Hence, it’s best to go for diplomatic efforts to engage with foreign governments and international organizations to express concerns about the anti-LGBTQ+ laws.
Foreign governments should be encouraged to use diplomatic pressure and condition aid or assistance on improvements in human rights, including the repeal of discriminatory laws and provide support programs and initiatives that empower LGBTQ+ communities of Uganda, promote inclusivity between them, and provide them with resources for legal and social support.
These steps can be used effectively to fight against the act and help in its repealing process and bring back the status quo where the LGBTQ+ can be free of draconic legal implications supplemented by the Ugandian Government and live their lives peacefully and democratically.
Conclusion
To sum up, the Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Act stands as a stark reminder for the complex intersection of legislative power, societal values, and individual rights. While Government and traditional proponents of society argue for the preservation of cultural and religious norms, critics emphasize the fundamental importance of human rights and the protection of marginalized communities.
The discourse surrounding this controversial legislation highlights the ongoing global struggle for LGBTQ+ rights and the need for open dialogue that transcends cultural, religious, and political boundaries.
As society evolves, it is crucial to navigate these discussions with empathy, understanding, and a commitment to fostering inclusivity, ensuring that the pursuit of justice and equality remains at the forefront of our collective efforts.
The Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Act serves as a poignant case study and urges us to look upon importance of upholding human dignity, irrespective of individual differences, and to work towards a world where acceptance and respect form the foundation of our shared humanity.
Thank you for taking the time to read this! Please share this article if you enjoyed it. Also, you can follow us on Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Pinterest to get more interesting articles.
Authored by Utsav Biswas, a 1st year Law Student at National Law University Odisha.